The changes of intended use according to the study of the CNN n. 39-2025/P
The study of the notary deals with the change of the intended use, that is, of the “this case that occurs in the presence of a useof the property or the individual real estate unit, different from the one originally absent“.
Particular attention is then attributed to the distinction between the change of intended use without building works and that with building activitiesas well as to distinction between change of intended use such as “Relevant” or “irrelevant” urbanisticallythat is, to the passage of the property from one to another functionally autonomous category from an urban point of view (e.g. from residential to tourist-receptive).
Finally, at an extreme summary completely, the two are reported synthesis developed by the guidelines on art. 23-ter, yours That summarize appropriately The effects of the saving house On this article, indeed not always immediately perceptible.
The usability according to the study of the CNN n. 40-2025/P
The study of the notary summarizes the changes that, from 2016 (SCIA 2) to today (Salva Casa), has undergone the discipline of the audibility referred to in art. 24 Consolidated Building Text which currently takes the name of Certificate Reporting of Phase (CD. Scag).
The study then recalls that the Scag must be presented for a series of interventions, also attesting to the conformity of the work to the authorized project. Precisely under the changed nature of the audibility (from the provision of the PA to act of the private individual), therefore, the study focuses on the role that usability plays in the contractual acts.
In fact, if the usability does not affect the legal marketability of a buildingconstituting the assumption of usability, however he affects his “economic” marketabilitywith all the consequences that derive from it on the level of the possible termination of the contract. Even these aspects, of a more purely legal nature, are particularly in -depth.
The investigations of ordinary or simplified conformity according to the study of the CNN n. 226-2024/P
The study of the notary analyzes the Articles 36 and 36-bis Consolidated construction text relating to the “regime” amnesty procedures after the changes introduced by the Salva Casa decree.
Particular attention is paid to notion of the assessments of compliance (simplified and ordinary), to its conditions and content (also economic) of the sanatorium measure. Among the insights, above all, theidentification (concrete) of the urban and building regulations to be kept in mindso as to dispel doubts about the references that the technician must take into consideration when submitting the application.
Finally, the new “simplified” or “asymmetrical” conformitywith the related reflexes for the urban planning mentions to be included in the documents, in the light of the well -known sentence of the United Sections Cassation n. 8239/2019 which specified its scope.
Final suggestions
As observed at the end of my previous contribution, therefore, I renew the invitation to consult these three studies, anticipating that they will be subject of analysis in the next issue of the magazine The Technical Office.
>> If you want to receive news like this directly on your smartphone subscribe to our new Telegram channel!
