New categories of building intervention
The reform replaces the current classification with a simplified five-categories system, structured according to criteria for the relevance of the intervention and urban-building impact. The new scheme eliminates the interpretative overlaps between extraordinary maintenance, restoration and conservative restoration and building renovation, sources of disputes and application uncertainties.
1) The first category includes the building and urban planning transformation interventions of the territory, which includes new buildings and urban renovations with modification of the design of the lots and the road network. A definition that definitively clarifies the scope of urban restructuring, today the subject of contrasting interpretations.
2) The second category concerns the transformation of the existing building heritage of a reconstructive nature, distinct based on the impact produced in the area. The demolitions and reconstructions with modifications of shape, prospects, sedime or planivolumetric characteristics, as well as the increases in volumes are included here. The reform differentiates this category from the previous one by eliminating the reference to the “building body as a whole”, a source of interpretative uncertainties in administrative jurisprudence.
3) The third category governs the interventions for the functional adjustment of the existing assets, which include works on structural parts or prospects without distorting the building organism. Here the current extraordinary structural maintenance, the restoration and structural conservative restoration and part of the light building renovation flow.
4) The fourth represents a residual category for non -structural interventions, which collects extraordinary maintenance and non -structural restoration. A simplification that should reduce interpretative difficulties on the boundaries between the different types.
5) Finally, the fifth category maintains free construction for ordinary maintenance and minor works, including light artifacts, seasonal works and temporary interventions.
The new administrative regimes
The correlation between categories of intervention and qualifying qualifications follows proportionality criteria with respect to the relevance of the intervention. The urban transformation interventions remain subject to building permit, while for the transformations of the existing heritage, the reform provides for the possibility of alternative trail to the permit, eliminating the current procedural rigidity.
The single access point represents one of the most significant innovations for professionals. The interested party must submit a single application to obtain all the necessary opinions, with certain times of conclusion of the procedure and mechanisms of silence-assent in the event of administrative inertia. The reform enhances the role of the designer technician through extensive assembly and self -certification mechanisms, transferring part of the administrative checks to professional liability.
The discipline of responsibilities is clarified by distinguishing the positions of the owner, client, manufacturer, works manager and designer. The text provides for a differentiated regime that should reduce uncertainties on the distribution of obligations between the different subjects involved in the building process.
Stop double compliance for ante ’67 abuses
The reform introduces a national classification of the types of building differentity, with objectively measurable quantitative and qualitative thresholds to distinguish the different situations of pathology. A system that should eliminate the current interpretative discrepancies between municipal offices and professionals, source of disputes and procedural slowdowns.
Overcoming the principle of double conformity for ante 1967 abuses certainly represents one of the most relevant innovations for professional practice. The current system, which requires the compliance of the intervention both to the legislation of the time and the current one, is in fact replaced by simplified procedures based on only compatibility verification with the minimum safety requirements.
The sanctioning regime is modulated according to criteria of proportionality, taking into account the absence of a uniform discipline before the 1967 bridge law.
The possibility of obtaining more authorization purposes with the single point of access point is then provided for the possibility of obtaining; You can submit a single application to obtain all the necessary opinions, from the Superintendency to Civil Engineer, eliminating the fragmentation of the obligations between different administrations. The reform as mentioned also provides for certain times for the conclusion of the procedures, with mechanisms of silence-assent to avoid the inertia of the offices, and to close the practices of still pending building amnesty.
Impacts on professional liability
The reform significantly extends the use of assessments and self -certifications, transferring part of the checks from the administration to the designer technician. The digital file file, connected to cadastral and urban planning databases, should simplify the checks of the legitimate state, but involves new responsibilities in document management.
Comparative table: categories of intervention and remediation criteria
| I wait | Current discipline (Presidential Decree 380/2001) | Reform proposal |
| Categories of intervention | 6 Categories: ordinary maintenance, extraordinary maintenance, restoration and conservative renovation, building renovation, new construction, urban restructuring | 5 simplified categories: urban transformation, reconstructive transformation, functional adaptation, non -structural interventions, free construction |
| Classification criterion | Definitions often superimposed with uncertain interpretative boundaries | Classification based on the relevance of the intervention and urban-building impact with clear defined formulas |
| Regulatory overlaps | Frequent uncertainties between extraordinary maintenance, restoration and building renovation | Elimination of overlaps through distinct functional categories |
| Sanatoria abuse ante 1967 | Double compliance principle: compliance with the regulations of the time and to the current one | Overcoming double conformity with verification of only minimum safety requirements |
| Sanitary procedure | Separate request for each administrative purpose | The only instance for multiple purposes (amnesty + new interventions) |
| Difficult classification | Interpretative criteria variable for territory | National classification with quantitative thresholds and objective qualitative |
| Sanctioning regime | Uniform sanctions regardless of the era of realization | Sanctions proportionate for the era and severity of the discrepancies |
| Building tolerances | Fragmentary and deformation discipline on the territory | National uniform criteria for all types of tolerance |
| Professional responsibilities | Mainly administrative checks | Extension of assessments and self -certifications with greater technical responsibilities |
Coordination with the construction discipline
The reform integrates the revision of the Consolidated Building text with the technical discipline of the buildings for construction, overcoming the current regulatory fragmentation. The text provides for the definition of risk classes for constructions based on criteria for optimizing the cost-benefit ratio, with gradually decreasing reliability levels.
The rationalization of constructions controls provides for a revision of the static testing activity and the development of forms of subsidiarity involving professional orders. An approach that should enhance the role of technicians in the supervision of the works, reducing the administrative charges to be paid by local authorities.
Implementation times and transitional provisions
Legislative decrees must be adopted within eighteen months from the date of entry into force of the delegation law, with the possibility of corrections and additions in the following two years. The transitory provisions safeguard the ongoing procedures, with the possibility for the interested parties to opt for the new simplified regime.
The adjustment of regional regulations to the new fundamental principles must take place within terms that will be established by the implementing decrees. The regions with special statutes will have to conform their legislation in compliance with the statutes and implementation rules.
>> If you want to receive news like this directly on your smartphone subscribe to our new Telegram channel!
